Formasi Ortodoksi Kristen dalam Dinamika Konflik Teologis dan Kekuasaan Gerejawi pada Era Patristik
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the formation of Christian orthodoxy in the patristic era by treating theological conflict and ecclesiastical power as interrelated dynamics. It employs a qualitative library-research approach with historical-theological analysis of academic literature on orthodoxy, heresy, councils, episcopal authority, and imperial involvement. The findings show that orthodoxy did not emerge through a single decisive act but through a gradual process involving the interpretation of Scripture and apostolic tradition, doctrinal controversy, identity differentiation, institutional-conciliar articulation, and ecclesial reception. Conflicts involving Gnosticism, Marcionism, Arianism, pneumatological disputes, and Christological controversies sharpened doctrinal boundaries, while episcopal authority, rivalry among major sees, deposition, excommunication, and imperial intervention shaped mechanisms of public legitimacy. The study’s novelty lies in the proposed Patristic Orthodoxy Formation Model, integrating normative foundations, hermeneutical contestation, identity differentiation, institutional-conciliar articulation, and reception and stabilization. The model shows that orthodoxy emerged through interaction between theological truth claims and historical processes that established ecclesial authority.
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Andriollo, Luisa. “The Emperor at the Council. Imperial Interventions in Late Antique Church Councils in Literary Sources and Documentary Records.” Millennium 18, no. 1 (2021): 175–202. https://doi.org/10.1515/mill-2021-0006.
Bauer, Walter, and Frederick William Danker. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. Chicago: The University of Chicago, 2001.
Birch, Vincent. “Growth of the Christian Idea: An Application of Bernard Lonergan’s Thought to Discourse on Doctrinal Development.” Irish Theological Quarterly 88, no. 2 (2023): 137–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400231160651.
Bobertz, Charles A. Cyprian of Carthage: Priest and Patron. Studia Patristica Supplements. Leuven: Peeters Publishers, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.13524425.
Boulluec, Alain Le. “The Birth of Heresiology.” In The Notion of Heresy in Greek Literature in the Second and Third Centuries, edited by David Lincicum and Nicholas Moore, 13–108. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198814092.003.0002.
Buchinger, Harald. “Liturgy in Early Christianity.” In The Cambridge Companion to Christian Liturgy, edited by Joris Geldhof, 7–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009186650.003.
Chandler, Kegan A. “Deuteros Theos: Constantine’s Christology at Nicaea.” Journal of Early Christian History 11, no. 3 (2021): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2222582X.2020.1845571.
Chang, Geoffrey. “The Pillar and Ground of Truth: Irenaeus’ Use of Ecclesiology Against the Heresies.” Perichoresis 21, no. 2 (2023): 4–20. https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2023-0013.
DelCogliano, Mark, ed. The Cambridge Edition of Early Christian Writings, Volume 4: Christ: Chalcedon and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009057103.
Edwards, Mark J. “The Creed.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea, edited by Young Richard Kim, 135–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108613200.007.
Gilski, Marek, and Damian Wąsek. “The Authority of Peter the Apostle in the Acts of the First Millennium Councils.” Vox Patrum 91 (2024): 213–34. https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.17187.
Humfress, Caroline. “‘Cherchez La Femme!’ Heresy and Law in Late Antiquity.” Studies in Church History 56 (2020): 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/stc.2019.3.
Ip, Pui Him. “`Arianism’ Ante Litteram in Origen’s Peri Archon 4.4.1.” The Journal of Theological Studies 72, no. 1 (2021): 247–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flaa147.
Kim, Yong Jun. “A Reformed Assessment on the Theological Differences between Cyril of Alexandria and Nestorius.” Korea Reformed Journal 65 (2023): 55–78. https://doi.org/10.57228/KRJ.65.2.
Kinzig, Wolfram. “The Creed of Nicaea: Old Questions, New Answers.” The Ecumenical Review 75, no. 2 (2023): 215–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/erev.12782.
Kooijman, Marijke. “Narratives of Authority around Chalcedon’s Canon 28: The Emperor Marcian, Bishop Leo I, and the Functions of Late-Antique Imperial Letters in Ecclesiastical Letter Collections.” Journal of Early Christian Studies 32, no. 4 (2024): 519–51. https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2024.a947486.
Leppin, Hartmut. “Christian Authorities.” In The Early Christians: From the Beginnings to Constantine, translated by Kathrin Luddecke, 116–222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009043618.005.
Litwa, M David. “Did Marcion Call the Creator `God’?” The Journal of Theological Studies 72, no. 1 (2021): 231–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flab010.
Livneh, Yonatan. “Historical Ruptures in Eusebius’ History of the Jerusalem Church.” Zeitschrift Für Antikes Christentum / Journal of Ancient Christianity 27, no. 3 (2023): 449–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/zac-2023-0026.
Mateiescu, Sebastian. “`In Contemplation Only’: Revisiting the Debate between the Chalcedonians and Anti-Chalcedonians on the Reality of the Natures of Christ.” Modern Theology 39, no. 3 (2023): 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12871.
McCashen, Grayden. “Liberius on Athanasius at Arles, Milan, and in Constantius’ Court.” The Journal of Theological Studies 74, no. 2 (2023): 673–705. https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flad034.
McDonald, Lee Martin. “The Emergence of Biblical Canons in Orthodox Christianity.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Bible in Orthodox Christianity, edited by Eugen J Pentiuc, 149–63. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190948658.013.12.
McGrath, Alister E. “Theorizing the Identity of Christ: On Early Christian Doctrinal Development.” In The Nature of Christian Doctrine: Its Origins, Development, and Function, 29–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198901440.003.0002.
Menze, Volker L. “The Black Swan of Chalcedon and Dioscorus’ Deposition.” In Patriarch Dioscorus of Alexandria: The Last Pharaoh and Ecclesiastical Politics in the Later Roman Empire, 151–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192871336.003.0005.
———. “The Emperor’s Henchman: Dioscorus and the `Robber-Council’.” In Patriarch Dioscorus of Alexandria: The Last Pharaoh and Ecclesiastical Politics in the Later Roman Empire, 89–150. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192871336.003.0004.
Niccolai, Lea. “Introduction.” In Christianity, Philosophy, and Roman Power: Constantine, Julian, and the Bishops on Exegesis and Empire, 1–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009299312.002.
Oliveira, Nycholas Lawrence David, and Jacobus Kok. “Codex and Contest: What an Early Christian Manuscript Reveals about Social Identity Formation Amid Persecution and Competing Christianities.” Religions 15, no. 1 (2024): 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15010044.
Parvis, Sara. “The Reception of Nicaea and Homoousios to 360.” In The Cambridge Companion to the Council of Nicaea, edited by Young Richard Kim, 225–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108613200.011.
Rukuni, Rugare, and Erna Oliver. “Nicaea as Political Orthodoxy: Imperial Christianity versus Episcopal Polities.” HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies 75, no. 4 (2019): a5313. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v75i4.5313.
Sandnes, Karl Olav. “The Rule of Faith: Getting the Jigsaw Puzzle Right.” Studia Theologica - Nordic Journal of Theology 77, no. 1 (2023): 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/0039338X.2021.2019829.
Senior, Donald. The New Testament: A Guide. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197530832.001.0001.
Slootjes, Daniëlle. “Dynamics of Power: The Nestorian Controversy, the Council of Ephesus of 431, and the Eastern Imperial Court.” In The Roman Imperial Court in the Principate and Late Antiquity, edited by Caillan Davenport and Meaghan McEvoy, 240–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192865236.003.0012.
Snyder, Hannah. “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research 104, no. 1 (November 2019): 333–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
Stewart, Alistair C. “Office, and Appointment to Office, in Early Christian Circles.” In The Cambridge History of Ancient Christianity, edited by Bruce W Longenecker and David E Wilhite, 536–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108620420.029.
Whelan, Robin. “Count Irenaeus and the Nestorian Controversy.” The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 76, no. 2 (2025): 245–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022046924001544.
Whitty, John Joseph. “Reading Basil of Caesarea’s On the Holy Spirit as Apology: Reassessing the Influence of Eustathius of Sebaste on the Treatise.” Vigiliae Christianae 77, no. 4 (2023): 353–74. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700720-bja10056.